Published: Updated:
Understanding Your Awra Score: The Six Dimensions That Make Up Your Daily Health
Product Education · 9 min read · July 2026
You open Awra. The number is 74. Yesterday was 88. What does that mean?
A single two-digit number looks like a verdict, but it's not. The 74 is not a grade. It's a mirror — six things stacked together: calories, protein, hydration, sleep, movement, and nutrition quality. It shows what the last week looked like across those dimensions without judging it.
This article walks you through the six dimensions, what they measure, how they're weighted, and what to do once you see the breakdown. The point is not to optimize all six. It's to see which one is pulling your number down, then decide if you want to shift it.
What the Score Actually Is
Your Awra Score is a 0–100 number built from six dimensions: sleep (20 points), movement (25 points), nutrition quality (20 points), calories (15 points), protein (10 points), and hydration (10 points).
The score is a rolling 7-day average, not "today." If you logged four days this week, the average is from those four days. Days you didn't log are skipped — they don't count as zeros.
A single number feels like a verdict, but it's not. The 74 doesn't mean "you did poorly." It means "across these six areas, here's where the average landed." It tells you what happened. It doesn't judge what should have happened.
The Six Dimensions
Sleep — 20 Points
Sleep is one of the two largest dimensions (along with movement). What it measures: your 7-day average sleep duration compared to your personal target. If you hit your target most nights, the dimension is near 100%. The dimension caps at 100% — extra sleep doesn't add more points.
Why it's weighted so heavily: sleep is one of the two dimensions that moves most people's score week to week, because it affects everything else — energy for movement, appetite regulation, recovery. A bad sleep week drags your overall score visibly.
Movement — 25 Points
Movement is the largest dimension. What it measures: your 7-day average active minutes per day, compared to a fixed 45-minute baseline (the same for everyone, not personalized). If you averaged 45 minutes/day, the dimension is at 100%.
Why it's weighted the highest: like sleep, movement is one of the two biggest influences on overall wellness. A sedentary week feels different from an active week. Movement being 25 points means a week of consistent activity moves your score noticeably.
Nutrition Quality — 20 Points
Nutrition quality is worth 20 points — the same weight as sleep. What it measures: a per-meal quality score (protein density, fibre, and macro balance), averaged across your week.
Why it's separate from calories: how you eat tends to matter more than how much over a week. You can hit your calorie target with processed food or whole food; the quality dimension captures that difference. Well-composed meals score higher than the same calories from less-balanced meals. This dimension does not track micronutrients, vitamins, or minerals.
Calories — 15 Points
What it measures: your 7-day average calorie intake compared to your personal energy target (calculated at onboarding).
The symmetric design: this is the only dimension that penalizes both under-eating and over-eating equally. A 20% overage costs the same points as a 20% deficit. The score is not weight-loss coded. It reflects the gap from your target in either direction.
Protein — 10 Points
What it measures: your 7-day average protein intake in grams compared to your personal target. The dimension caps at 100% — going over does not add extra points.
Why it's weighted lower: protein is easier to move than sleep or movement. Adding protein to one meal can shift this dimension noticeably in a week.
Hydration — 10 Points
What it measures: your 7-day average water intake compared to your personal target (usually set in glasses during onboarding).
Why it's weighted lower: hydration is often the fastest win. Adding one extra glass of water per day can move this dimension noticeably within a week.
Why the Weights Are What They Are
The weights are not arbitrary. They're a rough map of how much each dimension tends to move week to week and how much daily impact each one has on how you feel and recover.
Sleep and movement (20 + 25 = 45 points) — the two biggest levers
Sleep and movement together are worth 45 points — nearly half the score — because they have the biggest daily impact on how you feel and recover. A week of good sleep and consistent activity is felt differently from a week of poor sleep and long sitting sessions, even if everything else is identical. The weights reflect that. A single bad week on either dimension pulls the overall number down in a way you can see without looking hard.
Nutrition quality (20) vs. calories (15) — separated on purpose
These two are kept as separate dimensions because they measure different things. Calories answer "how much did you eat compared to what your body needs." Nutrition quality answers "how well-composed were the meals you ate." You can hit your calorie target with ultra-processed food and score well on calories; the quality dimension is what captures the difference between that and a week of whole-food meals with balanced macros. Quality is weighted slightly higher (20 vs. 15) because a week of nutrient-dense meals matters more for how you feel than perfectly hitting a calorie number.
Protein and hydration (10 + 10 = 20 points) — the two fastest wins
Protein and hydration are each 10 points. They're weighted lower not because they matter less, but because they're easier to shift. Adding one protein-forward snack or one extra glass of water per day moves these dimensions noticeably inside a week. The lower weight is a design decision: dimensions that are easy to move can't dominate the score, or the score would over-reward small, easy wins.
A Realistic Example
Let's walk through a concrete score to show how this reads.
Someone logs their week. Their sleep has been solid — they hit their 8-hour target five out of seven days. Their hydration has been great — they've been consistent with water. They logged three days of movement, averaging about 30 minutes. Their protein has been at about 70% of target because they haven't been thinking about it. Their meals have been well-composed when they logged them, but their calorie average is about 10% over their personal target.
How does that look in the score?
- Sleep: 18/20 (solid week, close to target)
- Hydration: 9/10 (close to target)
- Movement: 15/25 (30 min avg vs 45 min baseline)
- Nutrition Quality: 19/20 (well-composed meals)
- Calories: 13/15 (10% over target)
- Protein: 7/10 (consistently below target)
Total: roughly 81 out of 100.
What does that number tell them? Not "you did well" or "you did poorly." It tells them a specific story: "Sleep and water are solid. The meals are well-composed. The movement and protein are the two dimensions pulling the score down. Everything else is in range." That is useful information. It tells them exactly where the week was lopsided without being judgmental.
The person could decide: I want to move the protein up, so next week I'll add a protein source to breakfast. Or they could decide: I'm fine with that balance this week, I'll focus on movement next week. Or they could do neither, and just look at the number as an observation of what happened, not a directive about what should happen next.
A second example — a different starting point
Take a different reader. They've been moving a lot — they hit their 45-minute active baseline every day this week, some days more. Their protein has been consistent because they're used to tracking it. Their calorie average is close to target. But their sleep has been rough — a few late nights, an early morning, an average closer to 6 hours than their 8-hour target. Their water intake has been thin because they've been busy. Nutrition quality has been mixed — some well-composed meals, some quick grab-and-go choices.
How does that look in the score?
- Movement: 25/25 (above baseline all week)
- Protein: 10/10 (consistent)
- Calories: 14/15 (close to target)
- Sleep: 13/20 (short-sleep week)
- Hydration: 7/10 (below target)
- Nutrition Quality: 15/20 (mixed week)
Total: roughly 84 out of 100.
A higher score than the first example, but a very different picture. The message is: "Movement, protein, and calories are dialled in. Sleep and hydration are the two dimensions pulling the score down, and nutrition quality has more variation than the others." Same six dimensions, different lopsidedness. The lowest dimension is sleep — that's likely the biggest lever. And because sleep is worth 20 points and sits at 13, there's more room to move here than on hydration (worth 10 points, sitting at 7).
The point of both examples is that the shape of a week matters more than the number. Two 80-something scores can describe completely different weeks. The breakdown is where the useful information lives.
Which Dimension Should You Focus On?
The point of six dimensions is not "fix all six." It's "see which one is lowest, and consider shifting it."
Look at your score breakdown. The smallest one is usually the easiest to move. Small changes on your lowest dimension shift the overall score more than big changes on a dimension already near cap — it's simpler math and more practical.
The AI narrative shows cross-domain patterns — for example, how your protein and sleep tend to move together. That helps you see which dimensions interact, so you understand the compound effect of shifting one dimension at a time.
What the Score Is Not
The score is not a grade. It's not a pass-or-fail. It's not compliance.
The score is not about today — it's a rolling 7-day average. A single great day won't move your number meaningfully. It reflects the trend of the week.
The score is not weight-loss coded. Eating less than your target costs points, just like eating more. The score is about balance, not direction.
The score is not a measure of habits or mood. Those are logged and feed the daily AI narrative, but they don't contribute to the numeric score itself.
The score is not about micronutrients. Awra does not track vitamins or minerals. The six dimensions — calories, protein, hydration, sleep, movement, nutrition quality — are the complete list.
The score is not a competition. There is no leaderboard, no percentile against other users, no benchmark that says "the average score across everyone is X." Your number is only compared to your own targets and your own last seven days. Someone else's 82 tells you nothing about your 74, and your 74 last week tells you very little about your 74 this week unless you also read the breakdown.
The score is not a fixed reading of who you are. It shifts as you log more consistently, as your targets get more accurate, and as the seven-day window fills in. Early on — the first week or two — the number can look erratic, because a single logged day carries a lot of weight in a small dataset. That's normal. Once you have a stable base of logged days, the score settles into a truer reflection of your week.
The score is a mirror. It reflects what happened. It does not judge what should happen.
See How Your Six Dimensions Combine Into Your Awra Score
Understand the patterns in your nutrition, sleep, hydration, and activity through a composite daily health score. Available on iOS and Android.
This article describes Awra's scoring system. It is not medical advice. For guidance on your specific health, consult a qualified healthcare professional.